Press Room

Communities Against a Radioactive Environment

Tri-Valley CAREs' Member Matthew Swyers Writes About his Concerns With the 2011 Nuclear Wepons Budget
Mar11

Date: March 10, 2010

By: Matthew Swyers

Published in: The Tri-Valley Hereld

http://www.insidebayarea.com/trivalleyherald/letterstotheeditor/ci_14640928

Arm or disarm?

On Feb. 18, Vice President Joe Biden spoke about "the future of nuclear deterrence." Oddly, most of his speech was a weak attempt to conflate the Cold War action of deterrence with disarmament. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty demands that signatory nuclear states disarm; it says nothing about deterrence. Biden represents the largest nuclear weapons budget in history as central to disarmament, but money for weapons dismantlement was actually cut in this proposed budget.

Biden defends this $624 million increase by claiming the weapons complex has been underfunded during the last decade, when, in fact, funding has remained flat or slightly higher each year.

 

I would agree that the weapons labs have been neglected from any real oversight as mismanagement, illegal accounting, security violations and dereliction in environmental cleanup have become the norm.

The administration needs a two-thirds Senate vote to ratify the START treaty. In an extortion quid pro quo letter, Senate Republicans and Joe Lieberman made it known that without this increased weapons funding, the START treaty is DOA.

But, as has been seen in numerous recent negotiations, these same senators can hardly be trusted.

To paraphrase Albert Einstein, "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for (nuclear) war."

Matthew Swyers

Livermore